A practice, not a firm

Some organizations don't need another solution.They need an investigation.

I work with a small number of mission-driven organizations each year to uncover hidden complexity, identify blind spots, and help them discover what is preventing their next chapter.

Justin Lake Whedon seated on a fallen log in a quiet stretch of pine forest.
Field notesPlate I

§ I

What is an Organizational Investigation?

An Organizational Investigation is a short, focused engagement to figure out what is actually getting in the way — before anyone spends money trying to fix it.

Organizations commission one when they can feel that something isn't right, but can't yet name it. When the surface answer keeps turning out to be a symptom of something deeper. When they'd rather understand the real problem than react to the obvious one.

You receive a clear Case File: what's actually going on, why it's happening, and a small, honest set of recommendations you can put to work — with or without me.

§ II

How an investigation unfolds.

  1. 01

    Case Intake

    A complimentary 15–20 minute conversation to understand what's happening, determine whether there is a case worth investigating, and decide whether we're the right fit for one another. At the end of the conversation we'll either determine the organization isn't the right fit, decide another resource would better serve your needs, or move forward with a Preliminary Investigation.

  2. 02

    Preliminary Investigation

    A short, paid engagement to determine whether a full Organizational Investigation is warranted. The deliverable is an Investigation Brief. If we proceed to the full investigation, the entire Preliminary Investigation fee is credited toward it.

  3. 03

    Organizational Investigation

    One active investigation at a time. Methods are chosen to fit the organization: interviews, process review, customer journey analysis, document review, competitive research, and field investigation when appropriate.

  4. 04

    Case File

    An Executive Case File and Evidence Appendix — root causes, recommendations, and a clear roadmap the organization can actually use.

  5. 05

    Implementation

    Optional. The recommendations belong to the organization. Implementation may be handled internally, by me, by trusted partners, or by any partner the organization chooses.

§ III · Selected

Case Files

01 / 05

Case File · 001

Confidential

National Membership Organization

The Situation

Information had grown difficult to navigate, and the organization suspected the website was to blame.

What We Discovered

The investigation revealed an outdated CMS, an incumbent vendor that had become complacent, and an information architecture that no longer matched how members actually behaved. User interviews with members and staff uncovered how people were really searching for information — and how far it had drifted from the way the site had been organized.

What Changed

The modernization followed the investigation, not the other way around. Information was reorganized around how members actually think, and the platform was chosen to serve that understanding.

The Result

Complexity became clarity.

Case File · 002

Confidential

Boutique Advisory Firm

The Situation

Every prospective client required multiple meetings before the right services could be recommended.

What We Discovered

The bottleneck wasn't selling — it was diagnosis. The founder was repeatedly spending valuable time asking the same intake questions.

What Changed

An intelligent intake process identified likely needs before the first conversation.

The Result

Clients arrived better prepared, and the founder reclaimed valuable time while improving recommendations.

Case File · 003

Confidential

Mission-Driven Nonprofit

The Situation

The organization had ambitious goals but struggled to communicate its mission clearly across multiple, unrelated audiences.

What We Discovered

The investigation revealed one overgrown website trying to serve too many audiences at once, an opportunity to separate distinct programs into focused digital experiences, and the concept of an AI Companion capable of helping users navigate one of life's most difficult moments — offering compassionate informational guidance carefully scoped to avoid medical advice.

What Changed

The mission was reorganized around the people it actually served, with dedicated pathways for each audience and a plan for the companion experience to follow.

The Result

The mission became easier to understand, support and engage with.

Case File · 004

Confidential

Small Digital Agency

The Situation

A successful business had been built around one primary market that was changing rapidly.

What We Discovered

The problem wasn't replacing lost work. The business model itself needed to evolve.

What Changed

Recurring revenue, diversified services, continuous learning and relationship-based business development created a far more resilient organization.

The Result

The organization stopped chasing its past and began intentionally designing its future.

Case File · 005

Confidential

Mental Health Media Organization

The Situation

Collecting meaningful patient stories required scheduling long interviews, creating unnecessary friction and limiting participation.

What We Discovered

The real obstacle wasn't willingness to share. It was the process. Most people were comfortable sharing a brief written or video testimonial immediately, while only a smaller number were ready for a deeper conversation.

What Changed

The organization shifted from interview-first to contribution-first by allowing people to submit short written or video stories directly through the website. Longer interviews became optional follow-up conversations when appropriate.

The Result

Participation increased, valuable stories surfaced more naturally, and the organization built a more scalable and compassionate storytelling process.

§ IV

Who this is for.

Organizations of roughly 20–150 people. Mission-driven. Growing. Good leadership. Healthy culture. Not failing — simply stuck.

  • "We've become more complicated."
  • "We aren't moving forward."
  • "We think AI matters but don't know how."
  • "We have too many systems."
  • "Something feels off."
  • "We know something needs to change. We just don't know what."

§ V

Commission an investigation.

Begin with a short conversation to see whether there is a case worth opening.

Case Intake

A complimentary 15–20 minute conversation.

Schedule a Case Intake

Currently accepting inquiries.